Good looking people should be careful of the company they keep. Hiding among you, the good looking, are the envious who feel they have missed out on promised greatness. They are in perpetual despair because they failed in their beauty goals and are on a crusade against the attractive, motivated by the basic human emotion: jealousy, anger, despair.
These characters work with their tongues, speaking of your attributes with the condescension of self-greatness despite no evidence of themselves being great. What are their beauty qualifications? They attempt to be the jurors of physical beauty despite never having been beautiful.
These angry souls turn to action, working to eviscerate your outward attribute, and to have the poor beauty work they have done elevated to adoration.
Part ways with the uninspired who do not pursue their own physical greatness—but want the rewards. Think of the cook who burns dinner but smiles as the defective meal is placed in front of you as though you do not notice it’s glaring error. They seek praise for sub-standard work.
These wounded birds tug at our hearts. You may see in them a sadness that will make you feel guilty and hold you back. In some cases, they mean you no intentional harm, but their pain will become a weight you have to pull. If treated incorrectly, they move into anger, and their goal becomes to define a world in which they do not participate.
They work to dislodge the prevailing standard of beauty and replace it with a new description and a lower bar that may be manipulated, a bar that a hippopotamus could hurdle. Men and women who fit these descriptions are in every corner of society secretly seething at their exclusion. They want the spotlight without paying the dues.
As may be interpreted, the belief, and sometimes the reality, is that the attractive of our world wield power and receive favor, but a lower bar would help the unattractive achieve those. Indeed, there is a natural pecking order that exists in the human condition, and one of the large influences is attractiveness, whatever the current dominant standard of attractiveness may be.
Entertainment and media have been infiltrated. From news outlets to sitcoms to film to musical performance, it appears that the bar is a lot lower. The beauty purge has begun.
In male circles, the well dressed and groomed man will be met with ridicule by his peers. For women, in an apparent bid to appeal to a new wave of militant feminism, adoration of the attractive is scorned. Faced with the empowered feminist, the promotion of women that men would describe as beautiful has ended, seen as submitting to patriarchal standards.
Note that the reciprocal has not occurred: overweight, ‘short’, or ‘unattractive’ men will not be tolerated (unless rich). Men who are attractive will be allowed entry only if they entertain and obey feminist ideals.
“Feminism was created to give unattractive women access to the mainstream of society.” – Rush Limbaugh
This movement is comprised first and foremost of women or men who have not achieved their social goals.
They attribute their lack of success to having been robbed by, or for the sake of, a ‘good looking person’. Hardcore rainbow flag waving Lesbians are the backbone of this movement for obvious reasons. Interestingly, gay men are rarely in this group—but only as long as the beautiful keep them as friends and emplace the gay male on the judge’s panel to decide who is beautiful. Otherwise they will turn on you and slit your throats with social media knives.
Ironically, the rest of the beauty hating cadre does include a few attractive women and handsome well-dressed men who have been shamed by the other groups for their beauty, which is why I start off with ‘be careful of the company you keep’. This group will be socially beaten until they lower their personal standard to that of those around them, victimized because they were not careful of the company they kept.
Males targeted by, and if not careful are later associated with, the anti-beauty crusade are almost entirely men who have been shamed for liking what they like, and cave in when criticized for what they like. To deflect criticism, these men date against their instincts, for fear of disappointing female colleagues and family members with their ‘shallow’ personal tastes. Instead, they choose a mate based on those people’s social agenda, ensuring the consequence of later regret.
The envious unhappy souls, not satisfied with their work ruining that group, next infiltrate social circles, whispering into the ear of empathetic people that the concept of beauty is unfair. Rather than develop their own attractiveness, which requires personal effort, they attack beauty in general. The beauty purge now opens a new front in their war. Once the beauty standard has been lowered or destroyed entirely, they blend themselves in to the mainstream of society, with the tacit agreement that for them helping you today, you will nominate them as beautiful tomorrow. On that day, they remove you, the good looking, to promote themselves and their standard instead.
“United Airlines was sued by two veteran flight attendants who wanted assignment to National Football League flights: a Black woman who has worked for the airline for 28 years and a Jewish woman with 34 years of tenure — say that they both tried repeatedly and unsuccessfully to get assigned to work the charter flights. They alleged that United ‘stacked’ the flights with ‘young hot blondes'”. The beauty purge has a new angle of attack. Assuming they began their flight attendant careers at twenty, that would make these two women forty-eight and fifty-four. (Burnson/Bloomberg).
They’ve convinced the population that there is an unfair advantage that is unconsciously applied to the beautiful, that not all are able to achieve their social goals due to the limits of their attractiveness. Their envy directs them to suggest that by being attractive, you are participating in, or if you appreciate beauty you are cooperating with, a bourgeois power structure. Then, you are guilted until you accept that your attractiveness or like thereof is conceit or shallowness on your part, you should like what they feel is important.
The beauty standard has been lowered to accommodate them. They have given up on establishing their own beauty, they seek to discredit yours.
We appreciate beauty in animals, but what about people?
And so, aspiring Social planners and socialists have strategized unseating the attractive.